El Dr. William Braud es uno de los muchos científicos que han desarrollado rigurosos estudios controlados desde un laboratorio que demuestran científicamente que la comunicación entre mentes (telepatía) no solo es muy real sino también comprobable en un laboratorio científico. En el transcurso de los estudios del Dr. Braud, varias personas fueron capaces de inducir (provocar) cambios medibles en la conductividad eléctrica de la epidermis de otra persona, que se hallaba situada a una distancia suficientemente como para que el receptor/paciente no tuviera consciencia de lo que estaba sucediendo.
Muchos de estos experimentos tuvieron lugar en habitaciones aisladas de cualquier tipo de señal/onda electromagnética, demostrándose así que este fenómeno no puede ser explicado/justificado mediante cualquier onda de energía conocida en el espectro de ondas convencionales.
En 1929, más de 148 casos diferentes de "múltiples" habían ya sido documentados por la ciencia. Quiere esto decir que una multiplicidad de científicos distantes entre sí geográficamente ( e incapaces por tanto de conocerse entonces) había hecho idénticos descubrimientos históricos prácticamente al mismo tiempo. Descubrimientos tales como:
– la rama matemática del cálculo
– la fotografía a color.
– el termómetro
– el telescopio
– la máquina de escribir
– el motor de vapor
– la misma teoría de la Evolución de las Especies…Los naturalistas Alfred Russell Wallace, Patrick Mathew y William Charles Wells ya habían considerado el concepto de evolución antes de 1859. Darwin no fue, en ese sentido original. El logro que le catapultó al estrellato mediático fue haber sabido incorporar al mencionado concepto, la idea de la "selección natural" como mecanismo evolutivo.
Existen más que maravillosas y abundantes pruebas de que la percepción extrasensorial es una cualidad natural que TODOS poseemos. Sin embargo los estudios encaminados a sacar a la luz esto han despertado poco interés y obtenido consecuentemente poco o nulo patrocinio. ¿Podría ser que la energía básica de la que se compone el Cosmos, sea Consciente de si misma de algún modo? Todo apunta a que así es, y que en breve este conocimiento largamente ocultado saldrá a la luz tras siglos de oscurantismo.
David Wilcock
…………………………
Dr. William Braud is one of a variety of scientists who have performed rigorous, laboratory-controlled studies proving that mind-to-mind communication is very real, and repeatable in a science lab. Participants were able to induce measurable changes in the electrical conductivity of another person's skin at a distance without their conscious awareness.
Many of these experiments were done in rooms shielded from all electromagnetic signals -- proving this phenomenon cannot be explained by any known energy waves in the conventional spectrum.
By 1929, over 148 different cases of "multiples" had been documented in science -- where multiple scientists independently make the same breakthroughs at the same time. This included calculus, the theory of evolution, color photography, thermometers, telescopes, typewriters and steamboats.
There is wonderful, abundant proof that "extrasensory perception" is a natural gift we all possess -- but these groundbreaking studies have received very little publicity. Could the basic energy of the Cosmos be conscious in some way?
Well, when Darwin first presented his theory in public, he did a joint presentation with Alfred Russell Wallace, a younger naturalist that had come up with the same ideas.
Wallace sent Darwin a letter in 1858 with an essay entitled "On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinetely from theoriginal type", However Darwin had started his sketches and notes for Origin of species in 1837 even though he had published nothing on it. Darwin and walace presented their findings at the same time in the'journal of the proceedings of the linean society' but the theory of descent with modification by natural selection was 'given' to Darwin.
"Natural selection was almost simultaneously "discovered" by Alfred Russell Wallace, a much younger naturalist that was then living in the Malay archipelago (he earned his living by collecting specimens). Wallace sent a manuscript with his ideas to Darwin, and the latter was startled (my guess :P) to discover that Wallace had arrived to the same conclusions that he had been ruminating on for many years (apparently he had been collecting as much data as he could to back up his theory before making it public). Anyway, both Wallace's paper and an abstract of Darwin's work were jointly read before the Linnean Society in England.
The concept of evolution was already being considered by many naturalists before 1859; that's partially the reason why Darwin's book was successful at the time and some of his ideas were accepted right away (not so others). In that sense, he was not "original". His greatest achievement was the integration of previous knowledge and the concept of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution.
(...)
Darwin always recognized Wallace's work (he never "took the credit"). After the publication of Origin of Species, previous writings by two authors, Patrick Matthew and William Charles Wells, were shown to contain concepts similar to natural selection. Again, Darwin himself recognized these works, although he had read neither before publishing his book
Wallace sent Darwin a letter in 1858 with an essay entitled "On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinetely from theoriginal type", However Darwin had started his sketches and notes for Origin of species in 1837 even though he had published nothing on it. Darwin and walace presented their findings at the same time in the'journal of the proceedings of the linean society' but the theory of descent with modification by natural selection was 'given' to Darwin.
"Natural selection was almost simultaneously "discovered" by Alfred Russell Wallace, a much younger naturalist that was then living in the Malay archipelago (he earned his living by collecting specimens). Wallace sent a manuscript with his ideas to Darwin, and the latter was startled (my guess :P) to discover that Wallace had arrived to the same conclusions that he had been ruminating on for many years (apparently he had been collecting as much data as he could to back up his theory before making it public). Anyway, both Wallace's paper and an abstract of Darwin's work were jointly read before the Linnean Society in England.
The concept of evolution was already being considered by many naturalists before 1859; that's partially the reason why Darwin's book was successful at the time and some of his ideas were accepted right away (not so others). In that sense, he was not "original". His greatest achievement was the integration of previous knowledge and the concept of natural selection as a mechanism for evolution.
(...)
Darwin always recognized Wallace's work (he never "took the credit"). After the publication of Origin of Species, previous writings by two authors, Patrick Matthew and William Charles Wells, were shown to contain concepts similar to natural selection. Again, Darwin himself recognized these works, although he had read neither before publishing his book
David Wilcock.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Si lo deseas puedes compartir algún comentario...